完了，欧洲在中国问题上出现灾难性分裂，马克龙为习近平带来了战略上的胜利

[beijingren3]

Europe Is Disastrously Split on China
Emmanuel Macron served Xi Jinping a strategic triumph on a silver platter.

https://foreignpolicy.com/2023/04/12/eu ... n-sanchez/

[beijingren3]

Macron pointed out that Europe and France are US allies, not "followers", and will make decisions of war and peace independently. That is not a reversal of alliances, just a fair warning both to the Chinese and the Americans at a time of growing hysteria that our interest is in peace and we will not be dragooned into war. It is important to make that point because the US has a disastrous record of military adventurism (Iraq, Afghanistan,..) which invariably ends in abject failure. It is also a mega-powerful and unstable partner with a very militaristic culture that is (not) dealing with intense internal political division, not a good combination. President Biden has repeatedly given contradictory messages about his country's relationship with Taiwan, despite the sensitivity of the entire matter. The reflexively anti-European and anti-Chinese Trump or someone of his ilk who could well succeed Biden. And even if Biden's democratic party stays in power, it is veering sharply to the left and might have questions about continuing to finance European defense with money that could be used for social spending. Europeans neglect these facts at their peril.

The reason some people with an ingrown megaphone are upset is that the usual gang of warmongers have not learnt a thing, and are fixating on China the way they used to fixate on Muslims. That is not to say that China does not represent a problem, just that neoconservatism is not the solution.

Another dirty little secret is that in Europe a lot of countries - including my own - are very happy to bribe the US military-industrial complex with the acquisition of US military hardware form time to time (at the expense of European defense capabilities) because they think it buys them a lifetime ticket for US financed defense without paying their fair share. They resent the only European country that has its military house in order and is actually capable of defending itself and are trying to kill any sort of European defense because it would mean that they have to pay for it themselves.

So three cheers for Macron, the only statesman who is good for his country, for the EU and in the end for the world!

马克龙指出，欧洲和法国是美国的盟友，不是“追随者”，将独立做出战争与和平的决定。 这不是联盟的倒退，只是在歇斯底里的情况下，对中国人和美国人的公平警告，即我们的利益在于和平，我们不会被迫卷入战争。 指出这一点很重要，因为美国有军事冒险主义（伊拉克、阿富汗……）的灾难性记录，而这种冒险主义总是以惨败告终。 它也是一个超级强大且不稳定的伙伴，具有非常军国主义的文化，正在（不）处理激烈的内部政治分歧，不是一个好的组合。 尽管整个问题很敏感，但拜登总统一再就他的国家与台湾的关系发出相互矛盾的信息。 反欧洲和反中国的特朗普或他的同类很可能接替拜登。 即使拜登的民主党继续执政，它也会急剧左倾，并可能对继续用可用于社会支出的资金为欧洲国防提供资金存有疑问。 欧洲人忽视这些事实，后果自负。

一些内生扩音器的人感到不安的原因是，通常的战争贩子团伙没有学到任何东西，并且像过去那样关注穆斯林一样关注中国。 这并不是说中国不代表问题，只是新保守主义不是解决方案。

另一个肮脏的小秘密是，在欧洲，很多国家——包括我自己的国家——都非常乐意不时通过购买美国军事硬件来贿赂美国军工联合体（以牺牲欧洲的防御能力为代价），因为他们 认为这为他们购买了美国资助的国防的终身门票，而无需支付他们应得的份额。 他们憎恨唯一一个军事设施井然有序、实际上有能力自卫的欧洲国家，并试图扼杀任何形式的欧洲防御，因为这意味着他们必须自己为此付出代价。

因此，为马克龙欢呼三声，他是唯一对自己的国家、欧盟乃至世界都有利的政治家！

[beijingren3]

马克龙不改变立场

Je ne regrette rien: Macron defends his comments on not being US ‘vassal’ over Taiwan

https://www.politico.eu/article/je-ne-r ... house/amp/

[beijingren3]

[newIdRobot]

Mark

[Blackhawk]

京人这个id换人值班了，用机器翻译应付差事


一些内生扩音器的人

[Blackhawk]

京人你后面值班的是：一些内生扩音器的人？

[beijingren3]

京人这个id换人值班了，用机器翻译应付差事

一些内生扩音器的人

[swanswan]

鸡巴登手上断送了我弟百年基业

[萧武达]

马龙的立场在访华之前就基本定了，西胖只是推了一把，做了backup而已
如果认为西胖2次谈话，就改变了一个大国领袖，是西胖厉害还是马龙傻呢