晴天霹雳,拥枪派没有多数阳痿

在这个辞旧迎新的日子里,建立一个全新的“美国新闻”版,以确保所有对美国新闻感兴趣的ID,在尊重彼此的基础上都可以畅所欲言。
版面规则
左也行,右也行,文明发帖就欢迎;粉也罢,黑也罢,互相尊重别谩骂。
回复
头像
YouHi楼主
论坛元老
论坛元老
YouHi 的博客
帖子互动: 2780
帖子: 37413
注册时间: 2022年 7月 22日 22:36

晴天霹雳,拥枪派没有多数阳痿

帖子 YouHi楼主 »

In this study, we showed that men experiencing SD are no more likely to own guns than men without SD. Our findings are important because they contribute to our understanding of factors associated with gun ownership by challenging the belief that phallic symbolism and masculinity somehow drive men experiencing SD to purchase guns. Our findings also remind us of the perils of gun culture rhetoric, which is often characterized by misinformation and political propaganda. Gun owners make a lot of claims about guns. Many will tell you that guns improve their lives, make them happy, and help them to sleep better at night, but none of these claims have been established empirically (Hill, Dowd-Arrow, Davis, et al., 2020; Hill, Dowd-Arrow, Burdette, Hale, et al., 2020; Hill, Dowd-Arrow, Burdette, Warner, et al. 2020). People who do not own guns will tell you that gun owners are motivated by impotence and fear, but these ideas are also unfounded (DeFronzo, 1979; Dowd-Arrow et al., 2019; Hauser & Kleck, 2013; Kleck, 1997). In these instances, gun culture rhetoric functions to justify guns (guns are helpful to me personally), discredit gun owners (gun owners are compensators), and further stigmatize men with SD as “dysfunctional nonpenetrative males” who need guns to cope with their broken bodies (Potts, 2000). Ultimately, these kinds of discussions are counterproductive for society because they distract us from the observable realities of guns and SD. We know that guns threaten public health in the United States (Fleegler et al., 2013; Fowler et al., 2015; Gani et al., 2017; Gramlich, 2019; Miller et al., 2002, 2007; Spitzer et al., 2017; Van Kesteren, 2014). We also know that SD can undermine the well-being of men (Brubaker & Johnson, 2008; Burnett et al., 2020; Burns & Mahalik, 2007; Chambers et al., 2017; Nicolini et al., 2019; Occhipinti et al., 2019; Potts, 2000; Wentzell et al., 2017). These issues will persist until we commit ourselves to more evidence-based discussions of SD and guns in society.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.117 ... 3211044342
上次由 YouHi 在 2023年 9月 28日 18:51 修改。
著名网友名单
🇺🇸 NC CHINESE AMERICANS FOR TRUMP 🛩️
你也是Trump U毕业的吗???
头像
YouHi楼主
论坛元老
论坛元老
YouHi 的博客
帖子互动: 2780
帖子: 37413
注册时间: 2022年 7月 22日 22:36

Re: 完了,拥枪派没有多数阳痿

帖子 YouHi楼主 »

许多人会告诉你,枪支改善了他们的生活,让他们快乐,并帮助他们晚上睡得更好,但这些说法都没有根据经验得到证实。
没有枪支的人会告诉你,枪支拥有者的动机是无能和恐惧,但这些想法也是没有根据的。

我流泪了。太感动了。
著名网友名单
🇺🇸 NC CHINESE AMERICANS FOR TRUMP 🛩️
你也是Trump U毕业的吗???
sks762(no)
著名写手
著名写手
帖子互动: 27
帖子: 316
注册时间: 2022年 10月 23日 23:36

Re: 完了,拥枪派没有多数阳痿

帖子 sks762(no) »

太监无毛自说自话
YouHi 写了: 2023年 9月 28日 18:50 许多人会告诉你,枪支改善了他们的生活,让他们快乐,并帮助他们晚上睡得更好,但这些说法都没有根据经验得到证实。
没有枪支的人会告诉你,枪支拥有者的动机是无能和恐惧,但这些想法也是没有根据的。

我流泪了。太感动了。
上次由 sks762 在 2023年 10月 3日 09:17 修改。
———————————————————
头像
YouHi楼主
论坛元老
论坛元老
YouHi 的博客
帖子互动: 2780
帖子: 37413
注册时间: 2022年 7月 22日 22:36

Re: 晴天霹雳,拥枪派没有多数阳痿

帖子 YouHi楼主 »

居然有专业人士专门化时间金钱研究拥枪派是不是真的阳痿。LOL

这就尴尬了。
著名网友名单
🇺🇸 NC CHINESE AMERICANS FOR TRUMP 🛩️
你也是Trump U毕业的吗???
头像
Danaus(集团名待定中)
著名点评
著名点评
Danaus 的博客
帖子互动: 304
帖子: 4968
注册时间: 2022年 7月 22日 11:13

Re: 晴天霹雳,拥枪派没有多数阳痿

帖子 Danaus(集团名待定中) »

YouHi 写了: 2023年 9月 28日 21:35 居然有专业人士专门化时间金钱研究拥枪派是不是真的阳痿。LOL

这就尴尬了。
图片
头像
Danaus(集团名待定中)
著名点评
著名点评
Danaus 的博客
帖子互动: 304
帖子: 4968
注册时间: 2022年 7月 22日 11:13

Re: 晴天霹雳,拥枪派没有多数阳痿

帖子 Danaus(集团名待定中) »

YouHi 写了: 2023年 9月 28日 18:34 In this study, we showed that men experiencing SD are no more likely to own guns than men without SD. Our findings are important because they contribute to our understanding of factors associated with gun ownership by challenging the belief that phallic symbolism and masculinity somehow drive men experiencing SD to purchase guns. Our findings also remind us of the perils of gun culture rhetoric, which is often characterized by misinformation and political propaganda. Gun owners make a lot of claims about guns. Many will tell you that guns improve their lives, make them happy, and help them to sleep better at night, but none of these claims have been established empirically (Hill, Dowd-Arrow, Davis, et al., 2020; Hill, Dowd-Arrow, Burdette, Hale, et al., 2020; Hill, Dowd-Arrow, Burdette, Warner, et al. 2020). People who do not own guns will tell you that gun owners are motivated by impotence and fear, but these ideas are also unfounded (DeFronzo, 1979; Dowd-Arrow et al., 2019; Hauser & Kleck, 2013; Kleck, 1997). In these instances, gun culture rhetoric functions to justify guns (guns are helpful to me personally), discredit gun owners (gun owners are compensators), and further stigmatize men with SD as “dysfunctional nonpenetrative males” who need guns to cope with their broken bodies (Potts, 2000). Ultimately, these kinds of discussions are counterproductive for society because they distract us from the observable realities of guns and SD. We know that guns threaten public health in the United States (Fleegler et al., 2013; Fowler et al., 2015; Gani et al., 2017; Gramlich, 2019; Miller et al., 2002, 2007; Spitzer et al., 2017; Van Kesteren, 2014). We also know that SD can undermine the well-being of men (Brubaker & Johnson, 2008; Burnett et al., 2020; Burns & Mahalik, 2007; Chambers et al., 2017; Nicolini et al., 2019; Occhipinti et al., 2019; Potts, 2000; Wentzell et al., 2017). These issues will persist until we commit ourselves to more evidence-based discussions of SD and guns in society.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.117 ... 3211044342
图片
回复

回到 “美国新闻(USA News)”