布林肯很嚣张啊

[TheMatrix]

[TheMatrix]

这话说的半懂不懂啊：

布林肯：你要么坐在国际体系的桌上，要么存在于项目单上

美国国务卿安东尼·布林肯在慕尼黑安全会议上回答有关国际体系因美中竞争发生变化的问题时对美国与其他国家的合作做出评论称，每个国都有自己的选择—— 坐在国际体系的桌上或存在于项目单上。

他说：“如果你不坐在国际体系的桌上，那么就会存在于项目单上。”

同时，他还表示，美国确实与中国存在战略竞争。 他补充说，在与中国争夺影响力的过程中，美国力求在自愿基础上吸引各国进行合作。

[TheMatrix]

美国最近股市高，表面形式一片大好，所以敢这么嚣张。

还开动宣传马力鼓吹中国经济不行了。

事情会有反转的。

[changjiang]

原话怎么说的？either on the table or on the agenda? 公司政治也是这样的啊。

[TheMatrix]

原话怎么说的？either on the table or on the agenda? 公司政治也是这样的啊。

找不到原文。好像都是从这来的：

[TheMatrix]

[zyyj2021]

原话怎么说的？either on the table or on the agenda? 公司政治也是这样的啊。

At the table or on the (chopping) board?

[altopalo]

翻译得太烂而已，项目单就是项目的对象，被kill的对象。
布林肯的意思是，你要和我和一起组队杀人，要么就是被杀那个。

[Scraper]

You are either on the table or the menu

[ferrygao]

穷兵黩武 大力下荷包蛋

[萧武达]

if you are not at my table， then on my table。。。呵呵呵

[malta]

You are either on the table or the menu

makes perfect sense. thanks.

[snowinwind]

这是说给川总听的？

[meiyoumajia]

很容易查到
search for “blinken table international system”

https://www.state.gov/secretary-antony- ... one%20that.

MODERATOR: Secretary Blinken, there is a – there is a feeling that – it’s more than a feeling, it’s what we see on – happening on the ground, that the U.S.-China tensions are leading to greater fragmentation and that you’re almost competing for alliances: who’s our ally? And we see this within the UN, in various UN institutions, but we just see it all around the globe. To what extent do you feel that you are challenged in your travels around the world on the fundamental questions?

SECRETARY BLINKEN: Well, first, it’s wonderful to be with my friends, wonderful to be back in Munich at the Security Conference, known among all of us as speed dating for diplomats. (Laughter.)

But we’ve done a couple of things, and I’ll come quickly to your question. From the start of this administration, we’ve made an investment, a reinvestment, in our alliances, in our partnerships, and in the multilateral system. We’ve reinvested, we’ve re-engaged, we’ve tried to rejuvenate, we’ve even reimagined. And the reason for that is simple: it’s because it’s in our interest to do it. Not a single one of the challenges that we have to face and that are so important to the interests of the American people can we effectively deal with alone, as powerful and as resourceful as we are. And so across the board, we’ve seen our comparative advantage as having a strong network of voluntary alliances, voluntary partnerships. And if you’re not at the table in the international system, you’re going to be on the menu. So it was very important for us to re-engage multilaterally, and we’ve done that.

。。。。

[wumaoslayer]

什么项目单？明明是“你要么上桌上吃肉，要么是菜单上的肉“

[ferrygao]

莫斯科不相信荷包蛋

[wmysh]

不为刀俎即为鱼肉

[TheMatrix]

不为刀俎即为鱼肉

明牌了。就不让你发展高科技。怎么招吧？

[TheMatrix]

很容易查到
search for “blinken table international system”

https://www.state.gov/secretary-antony- ... one%20that.

MODERATOR: Secretary Blinken, there is a – there is a feeling that – it’s more than a feeling, it’s what we see on – happening on the ground, that the U.S.-China tensions are leading to greater fragmentation and that you’re almost competing for alliances: who’s our ally? And we see this within the UN, in various UN institutions, but we just see it all around the globe. To what extent do you feel that you are challenged in your travels around the world on the fundamental questions?

SECRETARY BLINKEN: Well, first, it’s wonderful to be with my friends, wonderful to be back in Munich at the Security Conference, known among all of us as speed dating for diplomats. (Laughter.)

But we’ve done a couple of things, and I’ll come quickly to your question. From the start of this administration, we’ve made an investment, a reinvestment, in our alliances, in our partnerships, and in the multilateral system. We’ve reinvested, we’ve re-engaged, we’ve tried to rejuvenate, we’ve even reimagined. And the reason for that is simple: it’s because it’s in our interest to do it. Not a single one of the challenges that we have to face and that are so important to the interests of the American people can we effectively deal with alone, as powerful and as resourceful as we are. And so across the board, we’ve seen our comparative advantage as having a strong network of voluntary alliances, voluntary partnerships. And if you’re not at the table in the international system, you’re going to be on the menu. So it was very important for us to re-engage multilaterally, and we’ve done that.

。。。。

...you’re not at the table, you’re on the menu....

意思就是：我们大家都说好了，杀你吃肉。。。

[justChat]

那就发展呗

明牌了。就不让你发展高科技。怎么招吧？