需要比较详细的Y染色体型号信息
比如
O1b-F3323
测父系DNA中美的report提供的信息类似吗?
版主: Softfist
#3 Re: 测父系DNA中美的report提供的信息类似吗?
貌似国内两个都提供上传
Not sure what would be more accurate, but I'll share my results. I believe my results are more divergent than yours lol.
I uploaded my 23andme results to both sites as well.
Wegene: 93.16% Southern Han, 2.91% Hmong-Mien, 1.46% Lahu
23Mofang: 63.22% Hmong, 36.78% Zhuang. LOL, I'm not Han Chinese at all according to 23mofang. Quite the shock if you ask me. Digging further this may be because I used 23andme data? I'm not sure how they can cleanly separate Southern Han from Hmong anyway. I believe 23Mofang overassigns Hmong ancestry and Wegene underassigns minority ancestry. My real background is probably somewhere in between, since it doesn't make since that I can score nearly pure Han on Wegene and nearly no minority.
In my case the difference between Wegene and 23mofang is HUGE. 23Mofang implies I'm basically a sinicized minority while Wegene shows that i am majority Southern Han haha. I definitely identify as Han Chinese while my grandparents identified as "Hakka" (subset of Han) so I'll continue doing that. I never had any familiarity with Hmong or Zhuang culture/identity. I do know Hakka people have a long history of intermarrying regional tribes which explains my high level of "minority" ancestry at least according to 23mofang.
工具机谈智商, 犹如妓女谈贞操, 哪壶不开提哪壶
呼叫鸡谈造谣, 犹如站街女谈卖淫, 那是行家里手
#4 Re: 测父系DNA中美的report提供的信息类似吗?
Wegene: 93.16% Southern Han ~ 23Mofang: 63.22% Hmong, 36.78% Zhuang
这不是很准嘛
63.22% + 36.78%总不能刚好93.16%吧?总得有点重合吧?
差个七七八八的百分点,很正常。
就是一套班子,两块牌子。Southern Han 跟sinicized Hmong 有啥区别
倒是zhuang的父系不该算汉吗?当然如果是女的,大概率也是俩X都是南蛮了。
这不是很准嘛
63.22% + 36.78%总不能刚好93.16%吧?总得有点重合吧?
差个七七八八的百分点,很正常。
就是一套班子,两块牌子。Southern Han 跟sinicized Hmong 有啥区别
倒是zhuang的父系不该算汉吗?当然如果是女的,大概率也是俩X都是南蛮了。