我老随便算了一下,聚聚税改给40万收入的双职工一年省了8w6

在这个辞旧迎新的日子里,建立一个全新的“美国新闻”版,以确保所有对美国新闻感兴趣的ID,在尊重彼此的基础上都可以畅所欲言。
版面规则
左也行,右也行,文明发帖就欢迎;粉也罢,黑也罢,互相尊重别谩骂。
头像
DIYer
著名点评
著名点评
帖子互动: 275
帖子: 3755
注册时间: 2023年 11月 7日 13:48

#61 Re: 我老随便算了一下,聚聚税改给40万收入的双职工一年省了8w6

帖子 DIYer »

赖美豪中 写了: 2024年 10月 20日 15:15 你这智商真牛b,你现在用的就是他娘的聚聚时代的税制啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊,这个税改2025年就过期了,你要多交8万6啊
别搞笑了,我有不是聚聚当选后才开始交税的,我不相信40万年收入2016年的时候要交17万税。
Jack12345
论坛支柱
论坛支柱
2023年度优秀版主
帖子互动: 640
帖子: 9208
注册时间: 2022年 7月 22日 11:46

#62 Re: 我老随便算了一下,聚聚税改给40万收入的双职工一年省了8w6

帖子 Jack12345 »

Zephyrca 写了: 2024年 10月 20日 19:53 拜登一遍遍大撒币给乌克兰是不是政府开支大??
给乌克兰 没多少钱,你算一算就知道了。美国 没有派一个士兵。

如果不支持 乌克兰,让普丁得逞,以后美国要花 上百倍的钱,还要死伤无数

以前 杜鲁门总统 不支持老蒋,那点小钱 都不愿意花。结果后面 被迫打了 朝鲜战争和越南战争。死伤无数 花钱无数。现在乌克兰同样道理

以前打伊拉克 打阿富汗 才出的钱多,5万亿美元 都花出去了
x3 图片
头像
YouHi
论坛元老
论坛元老
YouHi 的博客
帖子互动: 3081
帖子: 38984
注册时间: 2022年 7月 22日 22:36

#63 Re: 我老随便算了一下,聚聚税改给40万收入的双职工一年省了8w6

帖子 YouHi »

Jason6278 写了: 2024年 10月 20日 15:28 他除了丢人现眼还会啥?智商是遗传的,不能怪他。
属实。
著名网友名单
🇺🇸 NC CHINESE AMERICANS FOR TRUMP 🛩️
你也是Trump U毕业的吗???
头像
YouHi
论坛元老
论坛元老
YouHi 的博客
帖子互动: 3081
帖子: 38984
注册时间: 2022年 7月 22日 22:36

#64 Re: 我老随便算了一下,聚聚税改给40万收入的双职工一年省了8w6

帖子 YouHi »

老领导借AI装傻,一群廊五分分钟上去舔。真是笑死个人了。
著名网友名单
🇺🇸 NC CHINESE AMERICANS FOR TRUMP 🛩️
你也是Trump U毕业的吗???
Sunland(空空道人)
论坛点评
论坛点评
帖子互动: 247
帖子: 2281
注册时间: 2022年 8月 23日 23:41

#65 Re: 我老随便算了一下,聚聚税改给40万收入的双职工一年省了8w6

帖子 Sunland(空空道人) »

chatgpt算的你也不过目一下就敢往上贴?
我都已经帮你摘出这两行了还问我没看懂?
赖美豪中 写了: 2024年 10月 20日 15:18 当然是chatgpt啊,你没看懂啊,这个写错了而已,也就是说他有162,500 subject to 35%的税率,没啥问题啊
[/quote]
Sunland(空空道人)
论坛点评
论坛点评
帖子互动: 247
帖子: 2281
注册时间: 2022年 8月 23日 23:41

#66 Re: 我老随便算了一下,聚聚税改给40万收入的双职工一年省了8w6

帖子 Sunland(空空道人) »

他多算了七万,40万交17万的税, 42.5%。
小时候老师没强调要验算。
DIYer 写了: 2024年 10月 20日 20:16 别搞笑了,我有不是聚聚当选后才开始交税的,我不相信40万年收入2016年的时候要交17万税。
snowinwind
见习点评
见习点评
帖子互动: 165
帖子: 1979
注册时间: 2022年 8月 17日 12:54

#67 Re: 我老随便算了一下,聚聚税改给40万收入的双职工一年省了8w6

帖子 snowinwind »

这是啥数学水平?
2017年33%的税率区间是$233,351 - $416,700,你这里的taxable income才$379,200,怎么可能还有35%的税率?
sensasian(sense)
正式写手
正式写手
帖子互动: 33
帖子: 181
注册时间: 2023年 5月 23日 23:05

#68 Re: 我老随便算了一下,聚聚税改给40万收入的双职工一年省了8w6

帖子 sensasian(sense) »

TCJA is neutral for high income W2 families living in high state/local tax states, due to 10k SALT limit and AMT removal.

People who benefited significantly from TCJA - Schedule E income with large QBI (even SSTB are benefiting now with PTET).
dustdevil(尘魔)
正式会员
正式会员
帖子互动: 1
帖子: 28
注册时间: 2022年 10月 13日 14:58

#69 Re: 我老随便算了一下,聚聚税改给40万收入的双职工一年省了8w6

帖子 dustdevil(尘魔) »

这个算错了,总税收不是加起来,那些数字已经是累加过了的,这个拿任何一年1040gi读一下就清楚了。

40万收入,税改后大约省1万多一点的税,没有8万多那么多。

赖美豪中 写了: 2024年 10月 20日 13:20 To compare the taxes under the 2017 tax system and the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) of 2018 for a married couple with a pre-tax income of $400,000 (40w), we will focus on the key differences in tax brackets, standard deductions, and exemptions between the two systems.

Key Changes in 2018 (TCJA):
Tax Brackets:

2017: 7 tax brackets, with the highest rate of 39.6% for incomes above $470,700 (married filing jointly).
2018 (TCJA): 7 tax brackets, with the highest rate of 37% for incomes above $600,000 (married filing jointly).
Standard Deduction:

2017: $12,700 for married filing jointly.
2018 (TCJA): $24,000 for married filing jointly (doubled).
Personal Exemptions:

2017: $4,050 per person (so $8,100 for a married couple).
2018 (TCJA): Personal exemptions were eliminated.
State and Local Tax (SALT) Deduction:

2017: Allowed unlimited deductions for state and local taxes.
2018 (TCJA): Capped SALT deductions at $10,000.
Child Tax Credit:

2017: $1,000 per child (phased out for higher incomes).
2018 (TCJA): Increased to $2,000 per child (higher phase-out limits).
Let's calculate and compare the approximate tax liability for a married couple with a $400,000 income under both tax systems.

1. 2017 Tax Liability:
Income: $400,000
Standard Deduction: $12,700
Personal Exemptions: $8,100 (for two people)
Taxable Income: $400,000 - $12,700 - $8,100 = $379,200
Using 2017 tax brackets:

Up to $18,650 taxed at 10% = $1,865
$18,650 to $75,900 taxed at 15% = $8,580
$75,900 to $153,100 taxed at 25% = $19,800
$153,100 to $233,350 taxed at 28% = $22,485
$233,350 to $416,700 taxed at 33% = $60,462
Remaining amount taxed at 35% ($379,200 - $416,700 = $162,500): $56,875
Total 2017 Tax Liability: $1,865 + $8,580 + $19,800 + $22,485 + $60,462 + $56,875 = $170,067

2. 2018 (TCJA) Tax Liability:
Income: $400,000
Standard Deduction: $24,000
Taxable Income: $400,000 - $24,000 = $376,000
Using 2018 tax brackets:

Up to $19,050 taxed at 10% = $1,905
$19,050 to $77,400 taxed at 12% = $7,008
$77,400 to $165,000 taxed at 22% = $19,266
$165,000 to $315,000 taxed at 24% = $36,000
Remaining amount taxed at 32% ($376,000 - $315,000 = $61,000): $19,520
Total 2018 (TCJA) Tax Liability: $1,905 + $7,008 + $19,266 + $36,000 + $19,520 = $83,699

Summary of Tax Liability:
2017 Tax Liability: $170,067
2018 (TCJA) Tax Liability: $83,699
Difference: The couple would save approximately $86,368 in taxes under the TCJA (2018) compared to 2017.
This comparison highlights that the TCJA generally reduced tax liability for higher-income earners by lowering tax rates and increasing standard deductions, though it eliminated personal exemptions and capped certain deductions like SALT.
赖美豪中(my pronouns: ha/ha)楼主
论坛元老
论坛元老
2023年度优秀版主
帖子互动: 4572
帖子: 46847
注册时间: 2022年 9月 6日 12:50

#70 Re: 我老随便算了一下,聚聚税改给40万收入的双职工一年省了8w6

帖子 赖美豪中(my pronouns: ha/ha)楼主 »

我已经另外开主题了,married省了应该是1w6,gpt给我算错了。
dustdevil 写了: 2024年 10月 21日 00:10 这个算错了,总税收不是加起来,那些数字已经是累加过了的,这个拿任何一年1040gi读一下就清楚了。

40万收入,税改后大约省1万多一点的税,没有8万多那么多。
If printing money would end poverty, printing diplomas would end stupidity.
ferrygao
论坛元老
论坛元老
帖子互动: 853
帖子: 20232
注册时间: 2023年 8月 28日 11:36

#71 Re: 我老随便算了一下,聚聚税改给40万收入的双职工一年省了8w6

帖子 ferrygao »

赖美豪中 写了: 2024年 10月 21日 00:40 我已经另外开主题了,married省了应该是1w6,gpt给我算错了。
你又算错了 明明是16w
知道很多人的居住环境以后 我终于明白为啥会有这些想法了
snowinwind
见习点评
见习点评
帖子互动: 165
帖子: 1979
注册时间: 2022年 8月 17日 12:54

#72 Re: 我老随便算了一下,聚聚税改给40万收入的双职工一年省了8w6

帖子 snowinwind »

被人抓住就是GPT的错?你自己没脑子?40万收入17万的税,没有阶梯都超过40%了,但凡小学毕业都不会犯这个错吧!
你这还真是代表了川粉的智商水平。
赖美豪中 写了: 2024年 10月 21日 00:40 我已经另外开主题了,married省了应该是1w6,gpt给我算错了。
x2 图片
头像
YouHi
论坛元老
论坛元老
YouHi 的博客
帖子互动: 3081
帖子: 38984
注册时间: 2022年 7月 22日 22:36

#73 Re: 我老随便算了一下,聚聚税改给40万收入的双职工一年省了8w6

帖子 YouHi »

snowinwind 写了: 2024年 10月 21日 10:10 被人抓住就是GPT的错?你自己没脑子?40万收入17万的税,没有阶梯都超过40%了,但凡小学毕业都不会犯这个错吧!
你这还真是代表了川粉的智商水平。
你错了。老领导无论从教育程度,收入,还是智商,都在粉儿的top 1%里。这点是毋庸置疑的。
x1 图片
著名网友名单
🇺🇸 NC CHINESE AMERICANS FOR TRUMP 🛩️
你也是Trump U毕业的吗???
geniushanbiao
论坛支柱
论坛支柱
帖子互动: 1738
帖子: 10817
注册时间: 2023年 11月 21日 09:28

#74 Re: 我老随便算了一下,聚聚税改给40万收入的双职工一年省了8w6

帖子 geniushanbiao »

CellcycleBa 写了: 2024年 10月 20日 13:50 那谁的税要多交?哪个收入层?
减少政府开支,大家的税都可以少交了。
xyzcrai(silverwing)
论坛点评
论坛点评
帖子互动: 456
帖子: 2277
注册时间: 2022年 10月 31日 20:47

#75 Re: 我老随便算了一下,聚聚税改给40万收入的双职工一年省了8w6

帖子 xyzcrai(silverwing) »

Jack12345 写了: 2024年 10月 20日 20:58 给乌克兰 没多少钱,你算一算就知道了。美国 没有派一个士兵。

如果不支持 乌克兰,让普丁得逞,以后美国要花 上百倍的钱,还要死伤无数

以前 杜鲁门总统 不支持老蒋,那点小钱 都不愿意花。结果后面 被迫打了 朝鲜战争和越南战争。死伤无数 花钱无数。现在乌克兰同样道理

以前打伊拉克 打阿富汗 才出的钱多,5万亿美元 都花出去了
就是这个算法,不用出兵,只要出点儿小钱就把欧洲和俄国这两个主要对手拖住,没有更划算的做法了。
头像
VladPutin(清风不识字何故乱翻书)
论坛元老
论坛元老
VladPutin 的博客
帖子互动: 1808
帖子: 15061
注册时间: 2022年 7月 24日 11:12

#76 Re: 我老随便算了一下,聚聚税改给40万收入的双职工一年省了8w6

帖子 VladPutin(清风不识字何故乱翻书) »

看样子这一年到处哀嚎舔牎以为能省8万,结果发现屁也没省,有这点时间不如在后母堤坡门口多接几单。

蒙古国有愚豕浮阳外越,便结不通,频下清个痢虚之气。虽屡试开赛露之剂,终无寸效。遂引诣兽医师诊之。医者摩其腹良久,谓主人曰:"咄!此蠢物腹中空若悬磬,纵投万斛通肠开赛之剂,犹决涸泽而求鲋也,岂有济哉?"

图片

pathdream(葱韭集团团长)
论坛元老
论坛元老
帖子互动: 1662
帖子: 33196
注册时间: 2022年 7月 25日 11:42

#77 Re: 我老随便算了一下,聚聚税改给40万收入的双职工一年省了8w6

帖子 pathdream(葱韭集团团长) »

snowinwind 写了: 2024年 10月 21日 10:10 被人抓住就是GPT的错?你自己没脑子?40万收入17万的税,没有阶梯都超过40%了,但凡小学毕业都不会犯这个错吧!
你这还真是代表了川粉的智商水平。
自信一点 都是ai的错 老领导没有错
草你特铐谱祖宗十八代加后十八代 你踏马的去死吧
glowinglake
正式写手
正式写手
帖子互动: 11
帖子: 199
注册时间: 2022年 8月 28日 20:05

#78 Re: 我老随便算了一下,聚聚税改给40万收入的双职工一年省了8w6

帖子 glowinglake »

trump税改总体是降个人所得税,但对于东西海岸的50w+收入的中产是加税。
现在chatgpt就可以很准确的计算这个,基本没错误,猛的一批。

···
For a married couple filing jointly with a W-2 income of \$1,000,000, a \$3,000,000 mortgage at 5% interest, living in California, and ignoring capital gains or losses:

- **Federal Tax Liability Increased by Approximately \$19,273** due to the TCJA.
- **State Tax Liability Remains Unchanged** at **\$96,009**.
- **Total Tax Liability Increased by Approximately \$19,273**.

This increase is primarily due to the **capping of the SALT deduction** and the **reduction of the mortgage interest deduction limit**, which significantly increased their taxable income under the new tax law.
···




calculate how much tax impact has trump tax cut and jobs act had for a couple with W2 income 1 million, with a mortgage of 3 mil, at 5% interest rate, living in california. Ignore capital gains or losses. Factor in effects from AMT in your calculation.





Sure, I'd be happy to help you calculate the **tax impact of the Trump Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA)** for a couple with a **W-2 income of \$1 million**, a **\$3 million mortgage at 5% interest**, living in **California**, while **ignoring capital gains or losses** and **factoring in the effects of the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)**.

---

## **Overview**

To determine the tax impact, we'll calculate the couple's **federal and state tax liabilities** both **before and after the TCJA**, including the effects of the AMT. The difference between the two scenarios will represent the tax impact of the TCJA on this couple.

---

## **Assumptions**

1. **Filing Status**: Married Filing Jointly.
2. **Income**: W-2 income of \$1,000,000.
3. **Mortgage**: \$3,000,000 at 5% interest (annual interest payments of \$150,000).
4. **State**: California residents.
5. **Deductions**: Itemized deductions include state and local taxes (SALT) and mortgage interest.
6. **AMT**: Effects are included in both pre-TCJA and post-TCJA calculations.
7. **Other Income/Deductions**: Ignoring capital gains, losses, and other potential deductions or credits for simplicity.

---

## **1. Pre-TCJA Tax Calculation (2017 Tax Year)**

### **A. Federal Income Tax**

#### **1. Calculate Itemized Deductions**

**a. State and Local Taxes (SALT):**

- **State Income Tax**: Calculated based on California's tax brackets.
- **Property Tax**: Estimated at **1%** of the property value (assumed \$3 million home), so **\$30,000**.

**i. California State Income Tax Calculation:**

California's tax brackets for Married Filing Jointly in 2017:
**Bracket****Taxable Income Range****Tax Rate**
1%Up to \$16,0301%
2%\$16,031 – \$38,0022%
4%\$38,003 – \$59,9784%
6%\$59,979 – \$83,2586%
8%\$83,259 – \$105,2248%
9.3%\$105,225 – \$537,5009.3%
10.3%\$537,501 – \$645,50210.3%
11.3%\$645,503 – \$1,000,00011.3%
12.3%Over \$1,000,00012.3%
**Additional Tax****Over \$1,000,000****1% Mental Health Services Tax**
**Calculating State Income Tax:**

- **Total State Income Tax**: Approximately **\$96,009** (detailed calculations provided in the appendix below).

**b. Total SALT Deduction:**

- **State Income Tax**: \$96,009
- **Property Tax**: \$30,000
- **Total SALT**: **\$126,009**

**c. Mortgage Interest Deduction:**

- **Interest Paid**: \$150,000
- **Deductible Limit**: Interest on up to **\$1,000,000** of mortgage debt.
- **Deductible Interest**: \$1,000,000 * 5% = **\$50,000**

**d. Total Itemized Deductions:**

- **Total Itemized Deductions**: **\$126,009 (SALT) + \$50,000 (Mortgage Interest) = \$176,009**

#### **2. Calculate Taxable Income**

- **Adjusted Gross Income (AGI)**: \$1,000,000 (since only W-2 income is considered)
- **Personal Exemptions**: Phased out at this income level.
- **Taxable Income**: **AGI - Itemized Deductions**

\[
\text{Taxable Income} = \$1,000,000 - \$176,009 = **\$823,991**
\]

#### **3. Calculate Federal Tax Liability**

Using **2017 federal tax brackets** for Married Filing Jointly:
**Bracket****Taxable Income Range****Tax Rate**
10%Up to \$18,65010%
15%\$18,651 – \$75,90015%
25%\$75,901 – \$153,10025%
28%\$153,101 – \$233,35028%
33%\$233,351 – \$416,70033%
35%\$416,701 – \$470,70035%
39.6%Over \$470,70039.6%
**Calculating Tax Liability:**

1. **10% Bracket**:

\[
\$18,650 \times 10\% = \$1,865
\]

2. **15% Bracket**:

\[
(\$75,900 - \$18,650) \times 15\% = \$57,250 \times 15\% = \$8,587.50
\]

3. **25% Bracket**:

\[
(\$153,100 - \$75,900) \times 25\% = \$77,200 \times 25\% = \$19,300
\]

4. **28% Bracket**:

\[
(\$233,350 - \$153,100) \times 28\% = \$80,250 \times 28\% = \$22,470
\]

5. **33% Bracket**:

\[
(\$416,700 - \$233,350) \times 33\% = \$183,350 \times 33\% = \$60,505.50
\]

6. **35% Bracket**:

\[
(\$470,700 - \$416,700) \times 35\% = \$54,000 \times 35\% = \$18,900
\]

7. **39.6% Bracket**:

\[
(\$823,991 - \$470,700) \times 39.6\% = \$353,291 \times 39.6\% = \$140,902.84
\]

**Total Federal Tax Liability (Before AMT):**

\[
\begin{align*}
\text{Total Tax} &= \$1,865 + \$8,587.50 + \$19,300 + \$22,470 + \$60,505.50 + \$18,900 + \$140,902.84 \\
&= **\$272,530.84**
\end{align*}
\]

#### **4. Calculate Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)**

**a. AMTI Calculation:**

- **AMT Adjustments**: Add back SALT deductions.

\[
\text{Alternative Minimum Taxable Income (AMTI)} = \text{Taxable Income} + \text{SALT Deduction}
\]

\[
\text{AMTI} = \$823,991 + \$126,009 = **\$950,000**
\]

**b. AMT Exemption:**

- **2017 AMT Exemption for MFJ**: \$84,500
- **Exemption Phase-Out**: Begins at \$160,900 and is completely phased out by \$498,900 for MFJ.
- **At \$950,000**, the exemption is **fully phased out**.

**c. Tentative Minimum Tax (TMT):**

- **AMT Rates**:

- 26% on the first \$187,800 of AMTI.
- 28% on AMTI exceeding \$187,800.

**Calculating TMT:**

1. **26% Rate**:

\[
\$187,800 \times 26\% = \$48,828
\]

2. **28% Rate**:

\[
(\$950,000 - \$187,800) \times 28\% = \$762,200 \times 28\% = \$213,416
\]

3. **Total TMT**:

\[
\$48,828 + \$213,416 = **\$262,244**
\]

**d. AMT Liability:**

- **AMT Liability**: TMT - Regular Tax Liability (before AMT)
- Since **Regular Tax (\$272,530.84) > TMT (\$262,244)**, **AMT does not apply**.

**e. Final Federal Tax Liability (Pre-TCJA):**

- **Federal Tax**: **\$272,530.84**

### **B. California State Income Tax**

**Total State Income Tax**: **\$96,009** (calculation detailed in the appendix).

---

## **2. Post-TCJA Tax Calculation (2018 Tax Year and Beyond)**

### **A. Federal Income Tax**

#### **1. Calculate Itemized Deductions**

**a. State and Local Taxes (SALT):**

- **SALT Deduction Cap**: **\$10,000**

**b. Mortgage Interest Deduction:**

- **Deductible Limit**: Interest on up to **\$750,000** of mortgage debt.
- **Deductible Interest**: \$750,000 * 5% = **\$37,500**

**c. Total Itemized Deductions:**

- **Total Itemized Deductions**: **\$10,000 (SALT Cap) + \$37,500 (Mortgage Interest) = \$47,500**

**d. Standard Deduction vs. Itemized Deductions:**

- **Standard Deduction (MFJ)**: \$24,000
- **Decision**: **Itemize deductions** (\$47,500 > \$24,000)

#### **2. Calculate Taxable Income**

- **Taxable Income**: **AGI - Itemized Deductions**

\[
\text{Taxable Income} = \$1,000,000 - \$47,500 = **\$952,500**
\]

#### **3. Calculate Federal Tax Liability**

Using **2018 federal tax brackets** for Married Filing Jointly:
**Bracket****Taxable Income Range****Tax Rate**
10%Up to \$19,05010%
12%\$19,051 – \$77,40012%
22%\$77,401 – \$165,00022%
24%\$165,001 – \$315,00024%
32%\$315,001 – \$400,00032%
35%\$400,001 – \$600,00035%
37%Over \$600,00037%
**Calculating Tax Liability:**

1. **10% Bracket**:

\[
\$19,050 \times 10\% = \$1,905
\]

2. **12% Bracket**:

\[
(\$77,400 - \$19,050) \times 12\% = \$58,350 \times 12\% = \$7,002
\]

3. **22% Bracket**:

\[
(\$165,000 - \$77,400) \times 22\% = \$87,600 \times 22\% = \$19,272
\]

4. **24% Bracket**:

\[
(\$315,000 - \$165,000) \times 24\% = \$150,000 \times 24\% = \$36,000
\]

5. **32% Bracket**:

\[
(\$400,000 - \$315,000) \times 32\% = \$85,000 \times 32\% = \$27,200
\]

6. **35% Bracket**:

\[
(\$600,000 - \$400,000) \times 35\% = \$200,000 \times 35\% = \$70,000
\]

7. **37% Bracket**:

\[
(\$952,500 - \$600,000) \times 37\% = \$352,500 \times 37\% = \$130,425
\]

**Total Federal Tax Liability (Before AMT):**

\[
\begin{align*}
\text{Total Tax} &= \$1,905 + \$7,002 + \$19,272 + \$36,000 + \$27,200 + \$70,000 + \$130,425 \\
&= **\$291,804**
\end{align*}
\]

#### **4. Calculate Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)**

**a. AMTI Calculation:**

- **AMT Adjustments**: Add back SALT deduction (now only \$10,000).

\[
\text{AMTI} = \$952,500 + \$10,000 = **\$962,500**
\]

**b. AMT Exemption:**

- **2018 AMT Exemption for MFJ**: \$109,400
- **Exemption Phase-Out**: Begins at **\$1,000,000**, fully phased out at \$1,437,600.
- **At AMTI of \$962,500**, the couple gets the **full exemption**.

**c. Tentative Minimum Tax (TMT):**

- **AMT Rates**:

- 26% on the first \$191,500 of AMTI.
- 28% on AMTI exceeding \$191,500.

**Calculating TMT:**

1. **26% Rate**:

\[
\$191,500 \times 26\% = \$49,790
\]

2. **28% Rate**:

\[
(\$962,500 - \$191,500) \times 28\% = \$771,000 \times 28\% = \$215,880
\]

3. **Total TMT**:

\[
\$49,790 + \$215,880 = **\$265,670**
\]

**d. AMT Liability:**

- **AMT Liability**: TMT - Regular Tax Liability (before AMT)
- Since **Regular Tax (\$291,804) > TMT (\$265,670)**, **AMT does not apply**.

**e. Final Federal Tax Liability (Post-TCJA):**

- **Federal Tax**: **\$291,804**

### **B. California State Income Tax**

**Total State Income Tax**: **\$96,009** (unchanged, as California did not conform to TCJA changes).

---

## **3. Comparing Pre-TCJA and Post-TCJA Tax Liabilities**

### **A. Federal Tax Liability**

- **Pre-TCJA Federal Tax**: \$272,530.84
- **Post-TCJA Federal Tax**: \$291,804

**Increase in Federal Tax Liability**:

\[
\$291,804 - \$272,530.84 = **\$19,273.16**
\]

### **B. California State Tax Liability**

- **Pre-TCJA State Tax**: \$96,009
- **Post-TCJA State Tax**: \$96,009

**No Change in State Tax Liability**

### **C. Total Tax Liability**
**Tax Component****Pre-TCJA****Post-TCJA****Difference**
**Federal Tax**\$272,530.84\$291,804**+\$19,273.16**
**California State Tax**\$96,009\$96,009\$0
**Total Tax Liability****\$368,539.84****\$387,813****+\$19,273.16**
---

## **4. **Tax Impact Summary**

The **Trump Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA)** resulted in an **increase of approximately \$19,273** in federal tax liability for the couple in this scenario. The **state tax liability remains unchanged**.

### **Key Factors Contributing to the Increased Federal Tax Liability:**

1. **SALT Deduction Cap**:

- **Pre-TCJA**: Full deduction of SALT (\$126,009).
- **Post-TCJA**: SALT deduction capped at **\$10,000**, effectively increasing taxable income by **\$116,009**.

2. **Mortgage Interest Deduction Limit**:

- **Pre-TCJA**: Interest on up to **\$1,000,000** of mortgage debt was deductible (\$50,000).
- **Post-TCJA**: Limit reduced to **\$750,000** of mortgage debt (\$37,500), decreasing the deduction by **\$12,500**.

3. **Tax Rate Changes**:

- While some tax brackets have lower rates post-TCJA, the loss of deductions led to a higher taxable income, pushing more income into higher tax brackets.

4. **AMT Adjustments**:

- **AMT exemption amounts increased**, and the phase-out thresholds were raised, but in both scenarios, AMT did not apply because the regular tax was higher.

---

## **Conclusion**

For a married couple filing jointly with a W-2 income of \$1,000,000, a \$3,000,000 mortgage at 5% interest, living in California, and ignoring capital gains or losses:

- **Federal Tax Liability Increased by Approximately \$19,273** due to the TCJA.
- **State Tax Liability Remains Unchanged** at **\$96,009**.
- **Total Tax Liability Increased by Approximately \$19,273**.

This increase is primarily due to the **capping of the SALT deduction** and the **reduction of the mortgage interest deduction limit**, which significantly increased their taxable income under the new tax law.

---

## **Appendix: Detailed California State Income Tax Calculation**

**California Tax Calculation (Both Pre-TCJA and Post-TCJA):**

1. **Taxable Income**: \$1,000,000

2. **Apply Tax Rates:**
**Bracket****Taxable Income Range****Tax Rate****Tax Calculation**
1%Up to \$16,0301%\$16,030 * 1% = **\$160.30**
2%\$16,031 – \$38,0022%(\$21,972) * 2% = **\$439.44**
4%\$38,003 – \$59,9784%(\$21,976) * 4% = **\$879.04**
6%\$59,979 – \$83,2586%(\$23,280) * 6% = **\$1,396.80**
8%\$83,259 – \$105,2248%(\$21,966) * 8% = **\$1,757.28**
9.3%\$105,225 – \$537,5009.3%(\$432,276) * 9.3% = **\$40,203.67**
10.3%\$537,501 – \$645,50210.3%(\$108,002) * 10.3% = **\$11,124.61**
11.3%\$645,503 – \$1,000,00011.3%(\$354,497) * 11.3% = **\$40,058.84**
**Additional Tax****Over \$1,000,000****1%****Not Applicable**
3. **Total State Income Tax:**

\[
\begin{align*}
\text{Total Tax} &= \$160.30 + \$439.44 + \$879.04 + \$1,396.80 + \$1,757.28 + \$40,203.67 + \$11,124.61 + \$40,058.84 \\
&= **\$96,019.98**
\end{align*}
\]

**Note:** Minor discrepancies may occur due to rounding.

---

## **Final Note**

This calculation provides an estimate based on the information provided and standard tax rules. **Actual tax liabilities can vary** based on additional factors such as:

- Other deductions and credits.
- Retirement contributions.
- Health savings accounts.
- Charitable contributions.
- Changes in state tax laws.

It's recommended to consult with a **certified tax professional** for personalized tax planning and to account for all variables in your specific situation.
CellcycleBa(CCB)
论坛支柱
论坛支柱
帖子互动: 894
帖子: 10138
注册时间: 2023年 10月 31日 00:23
来自: 大德州

#79 Re: 我老随便算了一下,聚聚税改给40万收入的双职工一年省了8w6

帖子 CellcycleBa(CCB) »

但老领导的用词是我老随便“算”了一下。
原来GTP就是老领导所谓的“算”。
pathdream 写了: 2024年 10月 21日 12:35 自信一点 都是ai的错 老领导没有错
郑重声明,细胞圈不是我儿子。
我跟细胞圈没关系。
虽然我儿子在版上也是很有名气的。
回复

回到 “美国新闻(USA News)”