Caravel 写了: 2022年 12月 1日 11:30 Woit最新贴的Nature 虫洞论文Holographic wormhole也很有意思,cover story,炒作的杰作。他反弦理论数十年如一日,这次也不意外,估计学术界大佬全得罪完了,在物理学都混不下去了,只能在数学系当lecturer。
https://www.nature.com/nature/volumes/612/issues/7938

版主: verdelite, TheMatrix
Caravel 写了: 2022年 12月 1日 11:30 Woit最新贴的Nature 虫洞论文Holographic wormhole也很有意思,cover story,炒作的杰作。他反弦理论数十年如一日,这次也不意外,估计学术界大佬全得罪完了,在物理学都混不下去了,只能在数学系当lecturer。
https://www.nature.com/nature/volumes/612/issues/7938
rgg 写了: 2022年 12月 1日 14:59 这个新闻值得单开一帖。John Baez 的评论也犀利:
John Baez says:
December 1, 2022 at 6:05 am
Unfortunately Natalie Wolchover didn’t seem to realize that this hype was merely hype: on Twitter she wrote: “Curious to see so many people approve of the article but bristle at the headline. Can someone (who has actually read our article or the Nature paper) articulate *why* they don’t think it’s valid to say the experiment created a wormhole?”
Various people who know what’s going on tried to explain it carefully and gently. But I think one has to be brutally clear in situations like this, so I replied:
They did an simulation that crudely, roughly mimicked a system dual to a 2d wormhole. So it’s like a kid scrawls a picture of an inside-out building and the headline blares
BREAKING NEWS: CHILD BUILDS TAJ MAHAL!
谷歌这帮人还能有什么credit。吹牛不上税太多了。各种好端端的词汇都被它们玩坏了。Caravel 写了: 2022年 12月 1日 19:24 这类黑洞的Hype一般都是搞弦理论的人弄出来的,什么Ads/CFT对偶性,Ads根本不是我们所在的时空
背后的model 是SYK model
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sachdev%E ... taev_model
看上去就是一种randomnized的quantum spin model, 原来的题目是random quantum Heisenberg magnet, 不知道为什么现在搞成量子引力的模型了
https://pic4.zhimg.com/v2-70080807319e0 ... e6cf_b.jpg