1，业余：搞明白了一个问题。完成了拖延多年的两篇文章。确定了来年的方向。
2，工作还在。
3，家里各种routine事务都做了。
4，人际交往不多但是满意。
5，网上人际交往满意。
新年resolution：继续。
发一个2024年的年终总结
版主： verdelite， TheMatrix
#2 Re: 发一个2024年的年终总结
其中一篇送去arxiv，它竟然拒了。好吧我赶在12月31日晚上12：00之前把它也改吧改吧也送杂志去了。现在两篇都under review了。毕竟2024年的事最好不延续到2025，2025还有2025的事。verdelite 写了： 2024年 12月 29日 21:46 1，业余：搞明白了一个问题。完成了拖延多年的两篇文章。确定了来年的方向。
2，工作还在。
3，家里各种routine事务都做了。
4，人际交往不多但是满意。
5，网上人际交往满意。
新年resolution：继续。
#4 Re: 发一个2024年的年终总结
1，作者上了黑名单的容易被拒；
2，非大学、非科研单位的容易被拒（此类直接on hold等待moderator审查）；
3，口气大的容易被拒（本文必将对xx学产生重大影响云云）
4，没啥original contribution的容易被拒（例如review，我那篇属于这类）
5，和主流观点不符的容易被拒（证伪爱因斯坦，推翻量子力学，造永动机等等）
6，word写的容易被拒
拒绝理由都是"does not contain sufficient original or substantive scholarly research and is not of interest to arXiv"。此外并不给出更多理由。
附拒信：
Dear author,
Thank you for submitting your work to arXiv. We regret to inform you that arXiv’s moderators have determined that your submission will not be accepted and made public on[ |http://arxiv.org][arXiv.org|http://arxiv.org].
Our moderators determined that your submission does not contain sufficient original or substantive scholarly research and is not of interest to arXiv.
For more information on moderation policies and procedures, please see: https://arxiv.org/help/moderation.
arXiv moderators strive to balance fair assessment with decision speed. We understand that this decision may be disappointing, and we apologize that, due to the high volume of submissions arXiv receives, we cannot offer more detailed feedback. Some authors have found that asking their personal network of colleagues or submitting to a conventional journal for peer review are alternative avenues to obtain feedback.
We appreciate your interest in arXiv and wish you the best.
Regards,
arXiv Support
上次由 verdelite 在 2025年 1月 1日 20:26 修改。
原因： 未提供修改原因
原因： 未提供修改原因
#5 Re: 发一个2024年的年终总结
学习了verdelite 写了： 2025年 1月 1日 20:23 1，作者上了黑名单的容易被拒；
2，非大学、非科研单位的容易被拒（此类直接on hold等待moderator审查）；
3，口气大的容易被拒（本文必将对xx学产生重大影响云云）
4，没啥original contribution的容易被拒（例如review，我那篇属于这类）
5，和主流观点不符的容易被拒（证伪爱因斯坦，推翻量子力学，造永动机等等）
6，word写的容易被拒
拒绝理由都是"does not contain sufficient original or substantive scholarly research and is not of interest to arXiv"。此外并不给出更多理由。
附拒信：
Dear author,
Thank you for submitting your work to arXiv. We regret to inform you that arXiv’s moderators have determined that your submission will not be accepted and made public on[ |http://arxiv.org][arXiv.org|http://arxiv.org].
Our moderators determined that your submission does not contain sufficient original or substantive scholarly research and is not of interest to arXiv.
For more information on moderation policies and procedures, please see: https://arxiv.org/help/moderation.
arXiv moderators strive to balance fair assessment with decision speed. We understand that this decision may be disappointing, and we apologize that, due to the high volume of submissions arXiv receives, we cannot offer more detailed feedback. Some authors have found that asking their personal network of colleagues or submitting to a conventional journal for peer review are alternative avenues to obtain feedback.
We appreciate your interest in arXiv and wish you the best.
Regards,
arXiv Support
