吹哨人：美帝制造的covid，period。
版主： Softfist
Re: 吹哨人：美帝制造的covid，period。
不止五度所, 还有其他的sites。milkmyduds 写了： 2022年 12月 28日 23:59 这个早都不是新闻了吧
Nih出资，福气做后台联系
把美帝研究出来的病毒搞到五毒所做实验
不想憋国实验室哪里遵守什么规则
卖实验动物的，不规范操作的
导致病毒泄漏
Re: 吹哨人：美帝制造的covid，period。
milkmyduds 写了： 2022年 12月 28日 23:59 这个早都不是新闻了吧
Nih出资，福气做后台联系
把美帝研究出来的病毒搞到五毒所做实验
这么重要的事情，一年只给十多万美元？
不想憋国实验室哪里遵守什么规则
卖实验动物的，不规范操作的
导致病毒泄漏
在荒茫而美丽的马勒戈壁上，生活着一群顽强的草泥马。。。
Re: 吹哨人：美帝制造的covid，period。
milkmyduds 写了： 2022年 12月 29日 00:10 这病毒叔估计至少有10多个lab有
可惜五毒所泄漏了
define 731? 武汉病毒所有个鸡巴。
叔还预测，美帝手里更厉害的病毒也有不少
将军们应该庆幸美帝lab不允许也没人卖实验动物lol
否则估计人类灭亡几次了
在荒茫而美丽的马勒戈壁上，生活着一群顽强的草泥马。。。
Re: 吹哨人：美帝制造的covid，period。
他其实也是在胡说八道。
It wasn’t until chapter 15 that it finally get down to its main topic, with chapter 1-14 can actually be scrapped from the book and chapter 15 can serve as the introduction instead, with all the explanation of US involvement in the research of bioweapons.
Chapter 16-17 are where Dr. Huff really presents his core arguments for this book. In particular this sentence: “These discussions resulted in publications indicating that Dr. Peter Daszak, president of EcoHealth Alliance, was working with the CIA, and that the biological agent commonly known as COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) had been in development at EcoHealth Alliance since 2012, and other evidence suggested that SARS-CoV-2 began earlier than 2012. The development of SARS-CoV-2 included several prominent US-based scientists and US academic institutions that received funding from numerous federal government agencies and private non-governmental organizations to complete the gain of function work on SARS-CoV-2.”
Furthermore the list of sequences after the COVID-19 became a pandemic is the closest thing as a hard proof data that looks hard to refute, with Dr. Huff’s conclusion as follows: “In my opinion, many of the people listed in this chapter behaved like a pharmaceutical pseudoscience mafia entrenched in the halls of the medical military industrial complex.”
But that’s just it, his opinion. The book promises to reveal but can only speculate, very convincingly, I must say. But after a second and third glance, the hard data still do not directly linked while the proof-less allegations are treated like facts. Hence, the book remains one of those journalism coverage or documentaries that have existed in the past 3 years, adding only to the noise and not providing a closure to the conspiracies.
And it gets weirder. In chapter 17 Dr. Huff is attempting to figure out how and why the virus was leaked by Wuhan Institute of Virology, through few different possible scenarios and then he guides us one by one to eliminate the possibilities and narrow down the conclusion. Yup, speculation after speculation, while not providing any proof on what happened. If you must know, the nominees include: global corporate greed, attempt to damage president Donald Trump, and an event that he thinks is similar like the Chernobyl incident in Soviet union in 1986 and the “Communist government’s” attempt to hide it.
So, after all of this, the big question remains: is he telling the truth? Chapter 20 serves as a bizarre attempt to validate himself as a whistleblower where he claims to be subjected to illegal psychological operation by the government, in order to shut him up. This includes drones spying above him, series of trespassers, hackers, wiretappings, and cars following him. The chapter itself is 30 pages long, almost 10% out of the total book. So, it must be true then? You know what, after finishing the book, I still don’t know. I guess nobody knows for sure except him.
Because, to be perfectly fair, let’s take a look at the counter-arguments made by the institute that Dr. Huff accuses, the EHA, in response of the book. Read it and judge it yourself: https://www.ecohealthalliance.org/2022/ ... ndrew-huff
Carl Sagan once said that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. To this regard, he did presents a lot of data, but the data are actually not direct evidences to anything. And instead, he creates a narration around the data to make a calculated speculation. It’s such a pity that he fails to elaborate on these extraordinary claims and fail to back it up with solid and clear evidence. Had he done this, this could be a massive game changer.
And in the end of the day if the intention was to tell the truth, I believe it could’ve been just done through a long article instead of a whole book filled with unnecessary gimmicks. But to his credit he did write an article about this but was rejected for publication in all the leading health policy and health economics journals. I wonder why.
It wasn’t until chapter 15 that it finally get down to its main topic, with chapter 1-14 can actually be scrapped from the book and chapter 15 can serve as the introduction instead, with all the explanation of US involvement in the research of bioweapons.
Chapter 16-17 are where Dr. Huff really presents his core arguments for this book. In particular this sentence: “These discussions resulted in publications indicating that Dr. Peter Daszak, president of EcoHealth Alliance, was working with the CIA, and that the biological agent commonly known as COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) had been in development at EcoHealth Alliance since 2012, and other evidence suggested that SARS-CoV-2 began earlier than 2012. The development of SARS-CoV-2 included several prominent US-based scientists and US academic institutions that received funding from numerous federal government agencies and private non-governmental organizations to complete the gain of function work on SARS-CoV-2.”
Furthermore the list of sequences after the COVID-19 became a pandemic is the closest thing as a hard proof data that looks hard to refute, with Dr. Huff’s conclusion as follows: “In my opinion, many of the people listed in this chapter behaved like a pharmaceutical pseudoscience mafia entrenched in the halls of the medical military industrial complex.”
But that’s just it, his opinion. The book promises to reveal but can only speculate, very convincingly, I must say. But after a second and third glance, the hard data still do not directly linked while the proof-less allegations are treated like facts. Hence, the book remains one of those journalism coverage or documentaries that have existed in the past 3 years, adding only to the noise and not providing a closure to the conspiracies.
And it gets weirder. In chapter 17 Dr. Huff is attempting to figure out how and why the virus was leaked by Wuhan Institute of Virology, through few different possible scenarios and then he guides us one by one to eliminate the possibilities and narrow down the conclusion. Yup, speculation after speculation, while not providing any proof on what happened. If you must know, the nominees include: global corporate greed, attempt to damage president Donald Trump, and an event that he thinks is similar like the Chernobyl incident in Soviet union in 1986 and the “Communist government’s” attempt to hide it.
So, after all of this, the big question remains: is he telling the truth? Chapter 20 serves as a bizarre attempt to validate himself as a whistleblower where he claims to be subjected to illegal psychological operation by the government, in order to shut him up. This includes drones spying above him, series of trespassers, hackers, wiretappings, and cars following him. The chapter itself is 30 pages long, almost 10% out of the total book. So, it must be true then? You know what, after finishing the book, I still don’t know. I guess nobody knows for sure except him.
Because, to be perfectly fair, let’s take a look at the counter-arguments made by the institute that Dr. Huff accuses, the EHA, in response of the book. Read it and judge it yourself: https://www.ecohealthalliance.org/2022/ ... ndrew-huff
Carl Sagan once said that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. To this regard, he did presents a lot of data, but the data are actually not direct evidences to anything. And instead, he creates a narration around the data to make a calculated speculation. It’s such a pity that he fails to elaborate on these extraordinary claims and fail to back it up with solid and clear evidence. Had he done this, this could be a massive game changer.
And in the end of the day if the intention was to tell the truth, I believe it could’ve been just done through a long article instead of a whole book filled with unnecessary gimmicks. But to his credit he did write an article about this but was rejected for publication in all the leading health policy and health economics journals. I wonder why.
在荒茫而美丽的马勒戈壁上，生活着一群顽强的草泥马。。。
Re: 吹哨人：美帝制造的covid，period。
pdf 没找到，但是找到了一个点评Project DEFUSE的pdf， https://www.naturalnews.com/files/Defus ... ysis-1.pdf
Re: 吹哨人：美帝制造的covid，period。
project defuse
这个proposal 是2018年提出来的。看这个分工，五度所的任务只是testing。没做合成。baric 大牛做spike protein等高难动作
（欢迎有证据的指正）
这个proposal 是2018年提出来的。看这个分工，五度所的任务只是testing。没做合成。baric 大牛做spike protein等高难动作
（欢迎有证据的指正）Re: 吹哨人：美帝制造的covid，period。
张雅婷粉58Red2 写了： 2022年 12月 29日 02:27 project defuse
这个proposal 是2018年提出来的。看这个分工，五度所的任务只是testing。没做合成。baric 大牛做spike protein等高难动作
还是只是收集的样品的测试，不是合成病毒的测试。说白话一点，石正丽就是负责抓蝙蝠、采集原始样本的。
在荒茫而美丽的马勒戈壁上，生活着一群顽强的草泥马。。。
Re: 吹哨人：美帝制造的covid，period。
确实。其它的四个组要么合成病毒，要么delivery病毒。有更多的机会密接泄露病毒。
