这个需要60票，要民主党配合。
完了 川普完了 法院裁定关税非法
版主： Softfist
#24 Re: 完了 川普完了 法院裁定关税非法
windy 写了： 2025年 8月 30日 06:41宪法规定关税政策归国会：宪法Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 (Taxing and Spending Clause):
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises聚聚现在大杀四方是用了一个漏洞.简单的说就是在一些紧急情况下可以制定关税政策。现在法院判的是总统给全世界加关税越权了。
Here are the main situations:National Security (Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962)
If the Department of Commerce finds that imports threaten U.S. national security, the president can raise tariffs or impose quotas.
Example: President Trump’s steel and aluminum tariffs in 2018.
Unfair Trade or Retaliation (Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974)
The president can impose tariffs in response to unfair foreign trade practices, like intellectual property theft or discrimination against U.S. exports.
Example: U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods starting in 2018.
Balance of Payments / Economic Emergency (Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974)
Allows the president to impose temporary tariffs (up to 15% for 150 days) if imports are harming the U.S. balance of payments.
Safeguard Measures (Section 201 of the Trade Act of 1974)
The president can impose tariffs or quotas if a surge of imports is causing serious injury to U.S. industries.
Example: tariffs on imported washing machines and solar panels in 2018.
Lincoln废奴和禁止州政府独立合法吗？扯鸡巴蛋的玩意
#26 美国上诉法院裁定特朗普政府今年4月与2月的关税违法
美国联邦巡回上诉法院的决定，是关于特朗普在4月贸易战加征的多国关税、与2月对中加墨加征的“芬太尼”关税。
上诉法院认为，这两类关税超出了1977年IEEPA法案向总统的授权范围。但特朗普加征的钢铝关税则不受影响。
至少到10月14日前，这些关税仍然有效。特朗普政府可以向美国最高法院上诉。所以，最后结果还有待观察。
https://www.reuters.com/legal/governmen ... 025-08-29/
NEW YORK (Reuters) - A divided U.S. appeals court ruled on Friday (Aug. 29, 2025) that most of Donald Trump's tariffs are illegal, undercutting the president's use of the levies as a key international economic policy tool.
The court allowed the tariffs to remain in place through October 14 to give the Trump administration a chance to file an appeal with the U.S. Supreme Court.
The 7-4 decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, D.C., addressed the legality of what Trump calls "reciprocal" tariffs imposed as part of his trade war in April, as well as a separate set of tariffs imposed in February against China, Canada and Mexico.
Trump justified both tariffs - and more recent levies - under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. IEEPA gives the president the power to address "unusual and extraordinary" threats during national emergencies.
The 1977 law had historically been used for imposing sanctions on enemies or freezing their assets. Trump is the first president to use IEEPA to impose tariffs.
Trump declared a national emergency in April. Trump said the February tariffs against China, Canada and Mexico were appropriate because those countries were not doing enough to stop illegal fentanyl from entering U.S., an allegation those countries have denied.
The court's decision does not impact tariffs issued under other legal authority, such as Trump's tariffs on steel and aluminum imports.
