OpenAI CEO 已经卖空所有公司的股票，跑得快啊

[Crocodile]

Sam Altman does not currently own shares in OpenAI, as he has stated he did not receive a "giant equity stake" in the for-profit entity, though he does have a net worth derived from other investments like Reddit and Airbnb. OpenAI is a private company, so its shares are not publicly traded. However, the company is in talks for a potential share sale that could value it at $500 billion, and there is potential for Altman to receive equity in the future.

[牛河梁]

准备跳槽Meta还是xAi？

[Crocodile]

准备跳槽Meta还是xAi？

这个只有他自己知道。不过，显然对chatGPT 的未来没有信心

[ghnc]

没想到楼起楼塌这么快

[thinkaout]

AI泡沫来的比想象中要快。AI的理论基础已经没有再进一步突破的可能了，剩下的就是寻找各种应用场景，这方面chatgpt毫无优势，已经走到头了。

这个只有他自己知道。不过，显然对chatGPT 的未来没有信心

[pathdream]

deepseek 便宜大碗 性价比一流

[bsmile]

这个只有他自己知道。不过，显然对chatGPT 的未来没有信心

他自己知道所谓的chatGPT 5是什么货色，同时，以他的能力和学识，他也清楚他不可能让chatGPT 5达到他所宣传的高度

[rtyu]

CEO本来就没有股票，卖的是什么股票？

It is accurate that Sam Altman does not own shares directly in OpenAI, though he has gained his net worth from other significant investments in companies like Reddit and Airbnb. This is because OpenAI's structure, originally set up as a nonprofit, required him to forego equity to maintain the status of a disinterested board member.

No, Sam Altman does not own direct equity in OpenAI, though he had a tiny, indirect stake through a Y Combinator fund and later through a Sequoia fund. While reports have surfaced about discussions to give him equity in the restructured company, OpenAI's official statement on its structure confirms that its CEO holds no equity, a position consistent with the nonprofit's original charter and mission to benefit humanity.

[Crocodile]

CEO本来就没有股票，卖的是什么股票？

那你再举个例子，还有哪个美国大公司CEO没有自己公司的股票？尤其是公司的创始人

[mmking]

属实，直接釜底抽薪

现在的售价已经不能justify投资了

deepseek 便宜大碗 性价比一流

[rtyu]

CEO本来就没有股票，卖的是什么股票？

那你再举个例子，还有哪个美国大公司CEO没有自己公司的股票？尤其是公司的创始人

我也是刚学的新知识：

This is because OpenAI's structure, originally set up as a nonprofit, required him to forego equity to maintain the status of a disinterested board member.

Yes, a board member of a nonprofit was likely required to forgo equity to maintain the status of a "disinterested board member". This is because a financial stake, such as equity, would violate the nonprofit's duty of loyalty and create a conflict of interest. Both the IRS and state laws impose strict rules on nonprofit board members to prevent them from personally benefiting from their service.

是的，非营利组织的董事会成员很可能需要放弃股权才能维持“无利害关系董事会成员”的身份。这是因为，诸如股权之类的财务利益会违反非营利组织的忠诚义务，并造成利益冲突。美国国税局和州法律都对非营利组织董事会成员施加了严格的规定，以防止他们利用其服务谋取个人利益。

还问了Gemini“美国哪个大公司CEO没有自己公司的股票？” 出来一篇CEO光荣事迹：

鲜有其闻：美国大型企业CEO中，谁是“无产”高管？

在当今美国商界，大型企业的首席执行官（CEO）薪酬方案中，公司股票或期权通常占据核心地位，此举旨在将其个人利益与股东利益深度绑定。然而，一个引人注目的例外是人工智能领域的领军人物——OpenAI的首席执行官萨姆·奥尔特曼（Sam Altman）。据公开信息及他本人所述，他在自己执掌的这家备受瞩目的公司中，并未持有任何股权。

OpenAI的特殊组织架构是导致这一罕见情况的关键因素。该公司最初以非营利组织的形态创立，旨在推动人工智能的友好发展。之后，为了筹集大规模研究所需的资金，公司创建了一个名为“上限利润”（capped-profit）的营利性实体。尽管如此，作为对公司使命的坚守，奥尔特曼选择不持有该营利性公司的股份。他曾公开表示，他从事这份工作是出于对AI技术发展的热情，而非为了个人财富的积累。

除了奥尔特曼这一广为人知的个案外，寻找其他美国大型上市公司中完全不持有本公司股票的CEO案例则极为困难。监管机构的规定以及公司治理的最佳实践，通常都鼓励或要求高层管理人员持有一定数量的公司股票，以此作为对公司未来发展的信心展示和对股东的承诺。

虽然无法完全排除在某些特殊情况下，例如在公司刚刚完成合并、CEO刚刚上任或在某些私营大型企业中，可能存在CEO暂时不持有股票的短暂阶段，但在《财富》500强等主流上市公司群体中，CEO零持股的现象几乎不存在。

综上所述，在探讨美国大公司CEO中谁没有自己公司的股票这一问题时，萨姆·奥尔特曼是一个明确且独特的例证。他的选择根植于OpenAI独特的历史和使命，也使他成为了现代企业领导层中一个非典型的代表。

如果萨姆·奥尔特曼没有获得股份，马斯克为什么不满OpenAI？

好的，这是一个非常深刻的问题。虽然萨姆·奥尔特曼个人没有从OpenAI获得股份，但这并非埃隆·马斯克（Elon Musk）不满的核心。马斯克的不满源于更深层次的、关于OpenAI使命和发展方向的根本分歧。

您可以将马斯克的立场理解为，他认为OpenAI“背叛”了创立时的初衷。以下是导致他不满的几个关键原因：

1. 违背了“非营利”的创始使命

初衷： 2015年，马斯克作为联合创始人之一，与其他成员共同创立OpenAI的初衷是建立一个非营利性的研究机构。其目标是确保通用人工智能（AGI）的发展能够造福全人类，而不是为了给股东创造利润，并以此抗衡像谷歌这样的大公司在AI领域的垄断。

转变： 2019年，OpenAI进行重组，成立了一个名为“OpenAI LP”的“利润上限”（capped-profit）营利性实体。这个实体可以接受大规模投资并向员工和投资者分配利润（尽管利润有上限）。马斯克认为，这一举动从根本上违背了非营利的核心原则，使公司走上了追逐利润的道路。

1. 从“开放”走向“封闭”

初衷： OpenAI的名字就体现了其“开放源代码”的承诺，即与全世界分享其技术和研究成果，以促进透明和安全。

转变： 随着模型（如GPT-3、GPT-4）变得越来越强大和商业化，OpenAI不再开源其最先进的模型架构和代码。马斯克认为，这使得OpenAI变成了一个“封闭”的、专有的黑箱，这与创立时的开放精神背道而驰。

1. 与微软的深度绑定

初衷： OpenAI的创立是为了成为一个独立的研究力量。

转变： 为了获得开发先进模型所需的巨额计算资源，OpenAI接受了微软超过130亿美元的投资。在马斯克看来，这种深度的合作关系使得OpenAI实际上成为了微软的一个“事实上的子公司”（de facto subsidiary）。他认为，OpenAI的技术和决策现在严重受到其最大商业伙伴和投资者的影响，失去了独立性，反而加剧了他最初想要避免的“大公司垄断AI”的局面。

1. 对AGI安全性的担忧

马斯克一直对AGI的潜在风险直言不讳。他认为，OpenAI在追求更强大模型的过程中，将商业利益置于了人类安全之上，其发展路径不够谨慎和透明。

总结来说，马斯克的不满并非针对萨姆·奥尔特曼个人是否致富，而是针对整个OpenAI公司的方向性转变。在他看来，OpenAI已经从一个致力于为全人类安全开发AI的开放、非营利组织，变成了一个由大型科技公司控制的、追求利润的封闭性商业实体。2024年初，马斯克正式对OpenAI及其CEO萨姆·奥尔特曼提起诉讼，其核心论点就是该公司违反了最初的创始协议。

[pathdream]

Why does Sam Altman not have equity in OpenAI?
AI Overview
Sam Altman has not historically held equity in OpenAI because of the company's initial nonprofit structure and his desire to maintain a disinterested board. He also cited his personal wealth from other investments and a philanthropic motivation to prioritize OpenAI's mission over financial gain. While there are ongoing discussions about potentially granting him equity as OpenAI transitions its corporate structure, he has largely avoided direct ownership to foster trust and align with the company's early mission.
Reasons for the Lack of Equity
Nonprofit Structure:
OpenAI began as a nonprofit organization, and to maintain its tax-exempt status, it required a board with a majority of "disinterested" directors—individuals not personally invested in the company's financial outcomes.
Prioritizing Mission:
Altman stated he was motivated by the opportunity to work on something he was passionate about, rather than financial gain, and that a lack of equity reinforced this commitment.
Personal Wealth:
Altman was already a billionaire from his investments in companies like Reddit, Stripe, and Airbnb before OpenAI's significant growth. This wealth meant he did not need equity for personal financial benefit.
Fostering Trust:
By not having equity, Altman aimed to demonstrate his commitment to OpenAI's mission and reduce potential conflicts of interest or perceptions of self-serving motives, which was a source of contention in his relationship with co-founder Elon Musk and others.
Current Status
Indirect Interest:
While he doesn't have direct equity, Altman previously held a small, indirect stake through a fund associated with the startup accelerator Y Combinator and potentially a Sequoia fund, which he has since sold.
Ongoing Discussions:
As OpenAI transitions and explores new corporate structures, the question of whether Altman will receive a substantial equity stake is a subject of ongoing discussion and debate by the board and investors. However, there have been no specific plans or figures discussed to date.

从来没有曾经拥有 哪里有xxx

[Rather]

他自己知道所谓的chatGPT 5是什么货色，同时，以他的能力和学识，他也清楚他不可能让chatGPT 5达到他所宣传的高度

他有学识吗？他就一生意人。

[Crocodile]

Why does Sam Altman not have equity in OpenAI?
AI Overview
Sam Altman has not historically held equity in OpenAI because of the company's initial nonprofit structure and his desire to maintain a disinterested board. He also cited his personal wealth from other investments and a philanthropic motivation to prioritize OpenAI's mission over financial gain. While there are ongoing discussions about potentially granting him equity as OpenAI transitions its corporate structure, he has largely avoided direct ownership to foster trust and align with the company's early mission.
Reasons for the Lack of Equity
Nonprofit Structure:

谢谢

[glowinglake]

他本来就没股份，你们都不知道吗

[pathdream]

他本来就没股份，你们都不知道吗

不知道不知道不知道

直到lz贴出来以后才去查了一下哦

[cellcycle1]

Sam Altman does not currently own shares in OpenAI, as he has stated he did not receive a "giant equity stake" in the for-profit entity, though he does have a net worth derived from other investments like Reddit and Airbnb. OpenAI is a private company, so its shares are not publicly traded. However, the company is in talks for a potential share sale that could value it at $500 billion, and there is potential for Altman to receive equity in the future.

这家伙不是个干事业的，特想圈钱的

[Crocodile]

这家伙不是个干事业的，特想圈钱的

奇怪的是作为创始人，却不要股份，现在估值5000亿，却迟迟不上市

[dfc8622]

麻痹的，哪里卖空所有公司的股票了？真鸡巴胡说八道

Sam Altman does not currently own shares in OpenAI, as he has stated he did not receive a "giant equity stake" in the for-profit entity, though he does have a net worth derived from other investments like Reddit and Airbnb. OpenAI is a private company, so its shares are not publicly traded. However, the company is in talks for a potential share sale that could value it at $500 billion, and there is potential for Altman to receive equity in the future.

[Miraboreasu]

openai上市了么 没上市的那个卖股票不是咱们所说的套现吧